Legal Opinion

Maher v. Bull

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1864PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Chicago. This was a suit in chancery, instituted in the court below on the 11th day of October, 1860, by Cadwalader Bull, since deceased, against Hugh Maher and Edward Kelly, to dissolve a copartnership then existing between them, and to wind up its affairs. On the 26th day of October the defendants filed a joint and several answer, under oath, to which there was a replication on the 5th of December following.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Superior Court of Chicago. This was a suit in chancery, instituted in the court below on the 11th day of October, 1860, by Cadwalader Bull, since deceased, against Hugh Maher and Edward Kelly, to dissolve a copartnership then existing between them, and to wind up its affairs. On the 26th day of October the defendants filed a joint and several answer, under oath, to which there was a replication on the 5th of December following. On the 15th of February, 1861, the defendants filed their cross-bill, and on the 11th of September, 1861, the complainant filed his answer thereto, and…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Beckwith

' The appellee’s testator filed a bill in equity against the appellant and Edward Kelly to dissolve a copartnership between them, and wind up its affairs. A joint and several answer under oath was filed by the defendants, to which there was a replication. The defendants filed a cross-bill, alleging a viola-tion of the articles of copartnership by the complainant, from which they had sustained damages, and praying for their allowance. An answer was filed to the cross-bill, to which there was also a replication. Subsequently the appellant made-an application to file a further answer, which was…

2Cited by19 opinions

  1. Sartain v. Dixie Coal & Iron Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Robins v. LaskyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  3. Cox v. PierceIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Blakeslee v. BlakesleeIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
  5. People ex rel. Nelson v. Central Manufacturing District BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1940

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API