Scheimer v. Price
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Bay. (Green, J.) Trespass. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.
This case is an action of trespass, brought by the plaintiff, as commissioner of highways, under subdivision 6, c. 29, How. Stat., to recover for an alleged encroachment upon a certain highway in the township of Hampton, in the county of Bay. The suit was commenced in justice’s court, where it was tried, and the plaintiff had judgment. On appeal to the circuit, trial was had, and the circuit judge directed a verdict for the defendant.
The plaintiff sought to establish the highway by proving •user. It appeared by the plaintiff’s own showing that the public had never used the strip of land…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Board of Supervisors v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1916
- Eyde Bros. Development Co. v. Eaton County Drain CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
- Bayard v. Standard Oil Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1901
- Marchand v. Town of Maple GroveSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- City of Kentwood v. Sommerdyke EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.