Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Pharm v. Bartow

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided September 21, 2005No. 2004AP583PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.

¶ 1. Frederick Lee Pharm appeals from an order denying his petition for habeas corpus discharge from a commitment pursuant to Wis. Stat. ch. 980 (2003-04). Pharm argues that his waiver of extradition from Nevada to Wisconsin under the Interstate Agreement on Detainers (IAD) authorized only the Wisconsin criminal prosecution, not the later ch. 980 commitment proceeding. We hold that Pharm's rights under his waiver of extradition and the IAD were fully honored and that neither Pharm's waiver of extradition nor the IAD immunized Pharm from the subsequent ch. 980 commitment proceeding. We affirm…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cuyler v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Carchman v. NashSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. State v. HoltCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
  4. State Ex Rel. Fuentes v. Wisconsin Court of AppealsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Ronney Lee Snyder v. George SumnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pharm v. BartowWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  2. STATE EX REL. FREDERICK LEE PHARM v. BartowWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. BarrigaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API