Legal Opinion
United States v. Phanphil
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided June 28, 2002No. 01-0620/AFPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Judge CRAWFORD
delivered the opinion of the Court.
In accordance with his pleas, appellant was convicted of conspiring with two other soldiers (Airman First Class (A1C) Mathieu and Specialist (SPC) Bros) and his wife, Dorothy Phanphil, to violate 18 USC § 922(a)(1) by wrongfully engaging in the business of shipping, transporting, or dealing firearms in foreign or interstate commerce by purchasing weapons for another, violating a lawful general regulation by improper use of his government travel card, and violating 18 USC § 922(a)(6) by wrongfully making a false written statement likely or…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Geier v. American Honda Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. PraterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
- United States v. EppsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- United States of America v. Darrell Theodore Kind, Also Known as Troy SwanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Rodriguez-RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
- United States v. FrazierCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. RendonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
- United States v. JeffersCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
- United States v. Rodriguez-RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006