United States v. Jeffers
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
1ConcurrenceSullivan, Senior Judge
In my view, it is Congress who “make[s] Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces,” not the Manual drafters of the Discussion section of RCM 801(e)(5). U.S. Const., art. I, § 8, cl. 14. The majority continues to follow the lead of the Manual drafters in holding that the lawfulness of a disobeyed order is not an element of a criminal offense but a question of law to be decided by the military judge alone. I again must disagree and would hold that it is an element of the offense of disobedience of lawful orders under Article 92, UCMJ, which should have been decided by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. NewCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
- United States v. PhanphilCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002