Legal Opinion

City of New Orleans v. Ricker

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 12, 1915No. Nos. 21021, 21107PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Recorder’s Court of New Orleans; J. J. Fogarty and Ben P. Tiller, Recorders. F. Ricker and Fred Beck were convicted of violating ordinances of the City of New Orleans, and appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtLand, J.

These two cases involve the legality and constitutionality of a certain ordinance passed by the board of health of the city of New Orleans, known as the rat-proofing ordinances, for the purpose of suppressing and eradicating the bubonic plague.

Ricker was prosecuted on affidavit “for failing to have grocery and stable rat-proofed,” and Beck was prosecuted “for failing to have grocery store rat-proofed,” in violation of said ordinances.

The defendants were tried separately before different courts, and were convicted and sentenced. Both appealed to this court, and by consent of counsel the two…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Powell v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Health Department v. Rector of Trinity ChurchNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. City of New Orleans v. SanfordSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
  4. City of New Orleans v. SteinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
  5. State v. BelasSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Hutton v. City of Baton RougeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
  2. Tafaro's Investment Co. v. Division of Housing ImprovementSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
  3. City of New Orleans v. BeckSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
  4. State v. MillerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
  5. Gibbs v. City of NatchitochesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API