Legal Opinion

Halprin v. 2 Fifth Avenue Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 29, 1980PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order of the Supreme Court, New York County, entered July 19, 1979, granting plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and declaring paragraph 3 of Rider C, annexed to their respective leases, unconscionable and unenforceable, reversed, on the law, and the motion denied, without costs, and judgment is directed to be entered declaring paragraph 3 of Rider C to be a valid and enforceable obligation. The facts are substantially undisputed. Plaintiffs are all rent stabilized tenants in an apartment building owned by defendant 2 Fifth Avenue Company (a partnership) and managed by defendant Rudin…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wasservogel v. MeyerowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. BEDFORD BLDG. CO. INC. v. BeameNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Blake v. BiscardiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  4. Johnson v. JoyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schnee v. Jonas Equities, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1981
  2. East 56th Plaza, Inc. v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  3. Bentley v. 75 East End Owners, Inc. (In Re Bentley)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  4. Hollywood Leasing Corp. v. RosenblumAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1981
  5. Halprin v. 2 Fifth Avenue Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API