Legal Opinion

State v. Porter

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 6, 2015No. 71801-1-IPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAppelwick, J.

¶1 An offender’s date of discharge is the date the trial court receives notice that all sentence requirements have been satisfied. By December 18, 2008, the trial court had notice that Porter completed all of his sentence terms; however, he remained subject to a no-contact order, which expired on January 23, 2012. Porter petitioned the court for discharge after the expiration of his no-contact order. Accordingly, the trial court determined that his date of discharge was the date the no-contact order expired. For purposes of discharge, a no-contact order is not a sentence requirement. We…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rozner v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Christensen v. EllsworthWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Christensen v. EllsworthWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Berger v. SonnelandWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Berger v. SonnelandWashington Supreme Court · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Of Washington, V Waylon James HubbardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  2. State v. PorterWashington Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State v. PorterWashington Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API