Legal Opinion
City of Atlanta v. Hill
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided February 23, 1977No. 31927PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ingram, Justice.
The appellant municipality was ordered by the Superior Court of Fulton County in this mandamus case to issue the appellee a license to operate a beer and wine package store. Standards for the issuance of municipal alcoholic beverage licenses are contained in several ordinances of the city. The city contends on appeal that the appellee failed to meet these ordinance requirements and also that the refusal by the city to issue the license is *414not subject to mandamus in the courts. We reject both arguments of the city.
The trial judge determined after a hearing that the appellee’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Goldberg v. MulherinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Elizondo v. STATE, DEPT. OF REVENUE, ETC.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1977
- Asociación de Farmacias de la Comunidad v. Departamento de SaludSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2002
- Goldrush II v. City of MariettaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- Fulton County v. BartenfeldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1988
- Arras v. HerrinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.