Legal Opinion
Protest of St. Louis-S. F. R. Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 26, 1938No. 28433PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
Two protested tax items are involved in this appeal by a taxpayer from adverse decisions of the Court of Tax Review.
The first involves a levy for the general fund of the city of Hugo; the second a levy for the general fund of school district No. 32 of Choctaw county.
The city of Hugo requested appropriations originally for much more than it could receive by the tax levy allocated to it by the excise board. The excise board cut the appropriations to $30,712.32, which the city accepted. The financial statement and estimate show estimated income available of $31,-208 from sources other than ad…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- El Reno Wholesale Grocery Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- In Re MonsellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. BonaparteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Hines v. DaltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Excise Board of Marshall County v. School Dist. No. 34Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
3Cited by1 opinion
- Branch v. Oklahoma County Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938