Legal Opinion
Duggan v. Orthopaedic Institute of Ohio, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided April 18, 2005No. 3:03CV7651PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARR, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff, John Duggan, M.D., brings this suit against his former employer, Ortho-paedic Institute of Ohio, Inc. (OIO), his former colleagues, and OIO’s administrative director, Paul Clark. Plaintiffs claims are: 1) OIO and the individual defendants violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq.; 2) the individual defendants breached fiduciary obligations owed by them to the plaintiff; and 3) OIO is obligated to indemnify the plaintiff for certain losses and expenses. 1
Pending is defendant’s motion for summary judgment. For the reasons…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Edward E. ERCEGOVICH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hout v. City of MansfieldDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008
- Thomas v. Fletcher, Unpublished Decision (12-18-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
- Estate of Millhon v. Millhon Clinic, 07ap-413 (12-31-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007