Legal Opinion

Idaho Maryland Mines Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 6, 1952No. 50182PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LITTLETON, Judge.

This case arises out of an alleged taking, under and within the meaning of the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution, of plaintiff’s gold mining properties in the County of Nevada, California, by virtue of the complete closing of plaintiff’s mine by the War Production Board pursuant to Limitation Order L-208, issued by that Board, which order, plaintiff insists, upon the facts alleged, was arbitrary and violative of plaintiff’s property rights with respect to the operation of its gold mining properties.

The original petition in this case was filed on June 4, 1951. Defendant’s…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. RadfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. United States v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Central Eureka Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Wackerli v. MartindaleIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Williams v. WilliamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Bailey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  5. State Ex Rel. Milchem Inc. v. Third Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API