Kane v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen

The facts in this ease are similar to those in the case of Routt v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, 101 Neb. *646763. A motion for rehearing in that case has been filed, and will be considered and disposed of with the case at bar. Several questions are presented, but the main and determining question is identical with that presented in the Routt case. The constitution^ of the .defendant provides that a beneficiary member of the class to which the plaintiff belongs, in good standing, “who shall suffer the complete and permanent loss of sight of both eyes, * # * shall be considered totally…