Legal Opinion

Routt v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1917No. 19503PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from tbe district court for Douglas county: George A. Day, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtHamer, J.

The plaintiff and appellee brought suit in the district court for Douglas county seeking to recover on a benefit certificate held by him in the defendant company, a fraternal insurance association. He had for some time prior to June 5, 1913, been employed by the Union Pacific Railroad Company as a railway trainman. As a member of the appellant association he carried insurance to protect himself against disability. He became afflicted with what is known as “color-blindness,” and was discharged from the service of the railroad company because of his infirmity. It is contended by the plaintiff…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sheanon v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Sneck v. Travellers' InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Moore v. Ætna Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Lord v. American Mutual Accident Ass'n of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Beber v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenNebraska Supreme Court · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kane v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenNebraska Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API