Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Rao, Chief Judge:
The merchandise involved in this case consists of parts of an “undercleaner” designed for use in connection with the production of glass by the “float” glass method, imported from Belgium in four different shipments, covered by four entries. Four protests have been filed against one entry and one protest against three entries. These five protests were consolidated at the trial.
Most of the merchandise was assessed with duty at 14 per centum ad valorem under item 674.53 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States, as parts of machine tools. Certain of the merchandise covered…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- Liebert v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- Woolworth v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
- United States v. SussfeldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
- Downing & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.