Crosby v. Timolat
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by George W. Stevens, one of the defendants, from an order of the District Court of St. Louis County, Stearns, J., made October 12, 1891, overruling his demurrer to the complaint.
Read the full summary
Appeal by George W. Stevens, one of the defendants, from an order of the District Court of St. Louis County, Stearns, J., made October 12, 1891, overruling his demurrer to the complaint. The complaint stated in substance that in November, 1891, George W. Stevens and Harry N. Timolat, as partners, owned certain real estate in Douglas County, Wisconsin, and that John D. Miller and Timolat were copartners doing business in Duluth as real estate agents, buying and selling for a commission real estate for others. It further stated that Stevens & Co. employed Miller & Co. to sell the Wisconsin real…
1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.
This is an appeal by the defendant Stevens alone from an order overruling his demurrer to the complaint. It appears that Miller and Timolat were engaged as copartners in the business of buying and selling real estate. At the same time Stevens and the same Timolat were copartners in the enterprise of buying, holding, and selling certain specified tracts of land. That Miller and Timolat, as such copartners, and at the request of the defendants, Stevens and Timolat, as copartners, performed services in selling the land which was the subject of the partnership enterprise of the latter. After…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cole v. . ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Lathrop v. KnappWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
- Haven & White v. WakefieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
- Hayes v. BementThe Superior Court of New York City · 1850
- M'Fadden v. HuntSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1843
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Noyes v. OstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Frederickson v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Rose v. BeckhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
- Rankin v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1910