Legal Opinion

Hayes v. Bement

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided January 26, 1850PublishedCited by 5 opinions

This was a suit commenced in the late coiui of chancery, and transferred to this court from the supreme court. The facts appear sufficiently in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBy the Court. Campbell, J.

Thomas T. Hayes, the complainant, loaned his note for $2,000, to the special copartnership of Hayes & Heyer. The'note was payable to the order of, and indorsed by Hayes & Heyer as first indorsers, and by Ketchum, Rogers & Bement as second indorsers. It was discounted at a bank in Connecticut, and the proceeds were paid over to Hayes & Heyer. This latter firm having failed, and made an assign-’ ment to Bement; Ketchum, Rogers & Bement were charged as indorsers, and were compelled to take up the note. They caused proceedings to be instituted, and recovered a judgment against Thomas T. Hayes,…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Crosby v. TimolatSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  2. White v. . HackettNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  3. Friend v. MichaelisCity of New York Municipal Court · 1885
  4. In re BuckhauseDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1874
  5. People ex rel. Anilin v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API