W. E. Westfall, Inc. v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
The trial court granted accelerated judgment, GCR 1963, 116.1(2), in favor of defendant, finding that subject matter jurisdiction over plaintiff’s claims rested exclusively with the Michigan Public Service Commission. Plaintiff appeals as of right from this judgment.
Plaintiff’s complaint alleged that at some time prior to February 20, 1980, plaintiff made arrangements with defendant for a new telephone number. Concurrently, plaintiff arranged for defendant to place an "intercept” on its former telephone number so that business calls would be referred to its new number. Plaintiff’s agents at…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Valentine v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1972
- Muskegon Agency, Inc. v. General Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1954
- Moultrie v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Borgess Hospital v. Berrien CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Hunter v. General Telephone Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rinaldo's Construction Corp. v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1997