Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Ennels

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 11, 2017No. Com. v. Ennels, J. No. 1895 MDA 2016PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

MOULTON, J.:

The Commonwealth appeals from the October 19, 2016 order entered by the Berks County Court of Common Pleas granting Appellee John Lamonte Ennels’ motion to suppress the results of a war-rantless blood test.1 On appeal, the Commonwealth makes two arguments: (1) that the ban on warrantless blood tests set out in Birchfield v. North Dakota, — U.S. -, 136 S.Ct. 2160, 195 L.Ed.2d 560 (2016), does not apply to those suspected of driving under the influence (“DUI”) of controlled substances, as opposed to alcohol; and (2) that, in any event, Ennels’ consent to the test was not…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. Riley v. Cal. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. MacKey v. MontrymSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. In the Interest of L.J.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Com. v. Kehr, II, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. Commonwealth v. MoyerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Commonwealth v. OlsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Commonwealth v. CarperSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API