Harmony Electric Co. v. Public Service Commission
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Linn, J.,
The appellant, Harmony Electric Company, supplies electric energy (1) for lighting, (2) for operating two inter-urban street railways, and (3) for industrial purposes; the first producing about 23% of its revenue, the second about 37%, and the third about 40%. From 1922 to May, 1927, the rates for industrial power were filed in three schedules B, D, and E. Appellant’s operations are conducted in four counties: Allegheny, Butler, Beaver and Lawrence. In 1927, it filed a new schedule — identified as H — increasing its rates for industrial power, and intended to supersede…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- State ex rel. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Service Commission of MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- United Fuel Gas Co. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- New Street Bridge Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- City of Philadelphia v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Yellow Cab Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947