Rainey v. W. R. Grace & Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. The facts, which involve the construction of the acts and rules of court regulating fees of clerks of the Circuit Courts of Appeals for indexing records on appeal, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Day
This case is here on certificate from the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The facts stated show that the appellant caused fifty or more copies of the apostles on appeal in an admiralty case to be printed under the first section of the act of Congress of February 13, 1911, c. 47, 36 Stat. 901. The appeal was taken from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Washington, and the copies of the apostles were printed and indexed under a rule of that court adopted June 13, 1911, in pursuance of the act of February 13, 1911. In due time the appellant filed…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- King v. CornellSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Bean v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
3Cited by10 opinions
- Barber Asphalt Paying Co. v. Standard Asphalt & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Tineo v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- City of Orlando v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
- Tineo v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Lovell-McConnell Manufacturing Co. v. Automobile Supply Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.