Harris v. City of Cincinnati
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partGorman, Presiding Judge
I concur with the judgment of the majority, but disagree with the majority’s remand of the case to the trial court for further proceedings. I do so because there is no question, at least in my mind, that the trial court has in fact determined this case on its merits and nothing further remains for determination by the trial court.
The prevailing-wage law, set forth in R.C. 4115.03(C), applies to the Tower Place Project because it was constructed pursuant to a contract with a public authority. However, there is an even more basic reason. It is undisputed that the site preparation for the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- General Accident Insurance v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Phung v. Waste Management, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
- State ex rel. Evans v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- State ex rel. Clark v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1965
- Episcopal Retirement Homes, Inc. v. Ohio Department of Industrial RelationsOhio Supreme Court · 1991