Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Furtick

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 30, 1928No. 12366Published

1DissentJustice Stabler

(dissenting) : 1 agree with the general propositions of law stated by Mr. Justice Cothran in his opinion, but I dissent from his conclusion that the judgment in this case should be reversed.

The defendants were tried on the charge of manufacturing intoxicating liquors; they relied upon the defense of alibi. As stated in the leading opinion, after one of the defendants had been cross examined by the solicitor, the trial Judge asked him a few questions. The information elicited by these questions was that he was about 23 years old, that he ran a two-horse farm for his mother, and that he and his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. White v. BaileyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
  3. Hart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  4. State v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1890
  5. Wilson v. Ohio River & Charleston Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API