Legal Opinion

State v. Atkinson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 12, 1890PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Before PRESSLEY, J., York, November, 1889. This was an indictment against Dennis C. Atkinson for unlawfully giving a prescription for beer.

Read the full summary

Before PRESSLEY, J., York, November, 1889. This was an indictment against Dennis C. Atkinson for unlawfully giving a prescription for beer. During the cross-examination by the solicitor of one of defendant’s witnesses, the following occurred: “By the Court: Now, Mr. Roumillat, do you swear solemnly, upon your oath, that this whole matter was not pretensive; not by previous arrangement between you and Dr. Atkinson, and that you kept him there for that purpose? Witness: I swear before God that it is not so. Q. You don’t keep him there for that purpose? A. Yes, sir; I will swear to that. Q. And…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mr. Justice McIver.

The defendant having been convicted *106under an indictment charging that he, “being a physician, unlawfully did give a prescription for spirituous or intoxicating liquors, to wit, one dozen bottles of beer, to one II. Moultrie Bratton, he, the said Dennis C. Atkinson, not then and there being in actual bona ficle attendance upon the said R. Moultrie Bratton as a patient,” appeals upon numerous grounds set out in the record, which are too long to be inserted here. Indeed, it is scarcely necessary to consider them in detail; for, although…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. GaskinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  2. City of Seattle v. HewetsonWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
  4. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
  5. State v. KennySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API