Legal Opinion
Brooks v. Colvin
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 7, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2015-0436Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ANDRE BROOKS, Plaintiff v. Civil Action No. 15-00436 (CKK/GMH) NANCY A. BERRYHILL, 1 Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant MEMORANDUM OPINION (January 7, 2019) This case was referred to Magistrate Judge G. Michael Harvey for consideration of Plaintiff Andre Brooks’ [23] Motion for Attorney’s Fees and preparation of a Report and Recommendation pursuant to Local Civil Rule 72.3(a). See Order Referring Case to a Magistrate Judge, ECF No. 26. Plaintiff requested reimbursement of fees in the amount of $14,958.08, which was later…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Astrue v. RatliffSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Brown v. PlataSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Role Models Amer Inc v. White, ThomasCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.