Legal Opinion

Scott v. Cincinnati, N. & C. Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided May 7, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court .by

Judge Thomas

Affirming.

Prior to September, 1932, the City of Newport had vested the Cincinnati, Newport & Covington (Street) Railway Company with.a franchise privilege to operate upon the streets of the city a street railway system, equipped with electrically propelled street cars for the transportation of passengers. Perhaps, also (the record not being clear on that point), it had consented for the substitution of passenger busses on some of its .streets, in lieu of electrically propelled street cars running upon fixed railway tracks. There arose a controversy between…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gathright v. H. M. Byllesby & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  2. Talbott, Auditor of Pub. Accts. v. Laffoon, Gov.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  3. Johnson County Gas Co. v. StaffordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  4. Woodall v. South Cov. & Cin. St. Ry Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  5. Schoening v. Paducah Water Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kansas City Terminal Railway Co. v. Kansas City Transit, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  2. City of Owensboro v. Evansville & Ohio Valley Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1969
  3. Rigelwood v. City of Bowling GreenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API