Legal Opinion

Kramer v. New Mexico Employment Security Division

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1992No. 20570PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FROST, Justice.

The Department of Labor, Employment Security Division (ESD), initially determined that Miriam Kramer (Kramer) was eligible to receive unemployment benefits after she voluntarily left her job with the New Mexico Human Services Department (HSD) for health reasons. ESD’s Appeals Tribunal, however, reversed that initial award of benefits, finding that Kramer was disqualified from receiving unemployment compensation under NMSA 1978, Section 51-1-7(A) (Repl. Pamp.1991). ESD’s Board of Review and then the District Court sustained the disqualification, and Kramer appeals. We…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ribera v. Employment Security CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Padilla v. REAL ESTATE COM'N OF STATE OF NMNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Lemon v. Employment Security CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Randolph v. New Mexico Employment Security DepartmentNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Molenda v. ThomsenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Regents of the University of New Mexico v. New Mexico Federation of TeachersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Fitzhugh v. New Mexico Department of Labor, Employment Security DivisionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Wescott v. State, Department of LaborAlaska Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API