Legal Opinion
Molenda v. Thomsen
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided May 1, 1989No. 17894PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STOWERS, Justice.
Irene Molenda (Molenda), plaintiff-appellant, appeals a district court judgment affirming a decision by the New Mexico Employment Security Department Board of Review (Board), defendant-appellee, to deny Molenda’s claim for unemployment compensation benefits. We affirm.
FACTS
In 1987 David A. Thomsen (Thomsen), formerly the City Attorney in Alamogordo, New Mexico, opened a private law office and offered Molenda a job as his legal secretary and assistant. Because Molenda had enjoyed working with Thomsen at the City Attorney’s Office since 1982, she accepted his job offer.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Duke City Lumber Co. v. New Mexico Environmental Improvement BoardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
- New Mexico Human Services Department v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- Register v. Roberson Const. Co., Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
- Kistler v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Ribera v. Employment Security CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. LuckieNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. MunozNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
- Kramer v. New Mexico Employment Security DivisionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- C Fusco v. Podiatry AssocNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009