Legal Opinion

Wescott v. State, Department of Labor

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 2000No. S-8688PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Anthony Wescott quit his roustabout job at Alaska Petroleum Contractors, Inc., (APC) because he believed that APC was unwilling to accommodate his disability, bilateral club feet. He applied for unemployment pay, but the Department of Labor denied him waiting-week benefits, finding that he had quit suitable work without good cause. Under AS 23.20.385(b), when the department decides questions of work suitability it must consider not just the claimant’s physical ability to perform the work but also the degree of risk that the work would pose to the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Municipality of Anchorage, Police & Fire Retirement Board v. CoffeyAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Herman v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCEDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  3. Reedy v. M.H. King Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State, Department of Revenue v. OSG Bulk Ships, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Krulla v. Barnett BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Calvert v. State, Department of Labor & Workforce Development, Employment Security DivisionAlaska Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API