Larson v. Fetherston
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.
Two issues are raised on this appeal:(1) Does the Sniadach decision, dated June 9, 1969, render the instant judgments inoperative; and(2) Did the funds deposited in the garnishee banks constitute trust funds not subject to garnishment?
Applicability of Sniadach Decision.
The respondents seek to avoid dismissal of their garnishment actions by arguing that:(1) The Sniadach decision was limited in scope and should be applied only to garnishment of wages, while wages are in the hands of the employer, claiming the purpose of the decision was only to protect wages; and(2) That the decision is only a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Coe v. Armour Fertilizer WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- State Ex Rel. La Follette v. RaskinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
3Cited by33 opinions
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Blair v. PitchessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Randone v. Appellate DepartmentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Claudine Hall v. Sylvia GarsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Olympic Forest Products, Inc. v. Chaussee Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1973
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.