Legal Opinion

Garwood v. Corbett

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1909No. 2,619PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Silver Bow County; Geo. M. Bourquin, Judge. Action by Joshua L. Garwood against Wallace Corbett and others. From an order granting defendants a new trial, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Smith

The complaint in this action alleges that in June, 1906, the defendants falsely represented to plaintiff that the ButteMeaderville Copper Mining Company was a corporation and owned a large number of mining claims in the county of Silver Bow; that plaintiff believed such false representations, and, relying thereon, entered into an agreement with the defendants whereby he was to sell the stock of the corporation; that he was to be reimbursed for any moneys expended by him out of the proceeds of stock sold by him; that, in reliance upon the defendants ’ representations, he abandoned his position…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stephens v. ElliottMontana Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Lewis v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Harrington v. Butte & Boston Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Helena & Livingston Smelting & Reduction Co. v. LynchMontana Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Patten v. HydeMontana Supreme Court · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Goldfield Mohawk Mining Co v. Frances-Mohawk Mining & Leasing Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Bollin v. Galesburg Horse & Mule Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API