Legal Opinion

Hewitt-Robins, Inc. v. Link-Belt Company

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided November 30, 1966No. 15655PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CASTLE, Circuit Judge.

Hewitt-Robbins, Inc., the plaintiff-appellant, brought this suit in the District Court as the assignee of Dischinger U.S. Patent No. 3,069,027, issued December 18, 1962, for “Reclaiming Method and Apparatus”. Plaintiff charged Link-Belt Company, the defendant-appel-lee, with infringement, and sought both injunctive relief and damages. The defendant denied validity and infringement and interposed two counterclaims: (1) for declaratory judgment that the patent is invalid and not infringed; and (2) for declaratory judgment of noninfringement by the reclaiming apparatus…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Union Asbestos & Rubber Company, by Change of Name Unarco Industries, Inc. v. Evans Products CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964
  4. Kreplik v. Cough Patents Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1911
  5. Radio Corporation of America v. AndreaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Deepsouth Packing Co. v. Laitram Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. LAITRAM CORPORATION v. Deepsouth Packing Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1970
  3. The Laitram Corporation v. Deepsouth Packing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  4. Deepsouth Packing Co. v. Laitram Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Paper Converting MacHine Company v. Magna-Graphics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API