Legal Opinion
LAITRAM CORPORATION v. Deepsouth Packing Co.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided March 10, 1970No. Civ. A. 67-861PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUBIN, District Judge:
The defendant, Deepsouth Packing Co., Inc., has requested a modification of the injunction issued on June 30, 1969 to make it clear that it does not prohibit the manufacture and sale of a slitter and deveiner unit in unassembled form for export to a Brazilian customer. The defendant will supply all of the parts necessary for the complete operation of the slitter and deveiner; it will be necessary for the buyer only to assemble the unit after arrival, provide electrical current and water. Assembly will require some mechanical skill. The seller proposes to do the assembly…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Lear, Inc. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United Shoe MacHinery Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Deepsouth Packing Co. v. Laitram Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- The Laitram Corporation v. Deepsouth Packing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Deepsouth Packing Co. v. Laitram Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Paper Converting MacHine Company v. Magna-Graphics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Paper Converting MacHine Company v. Magna-Graphics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984