Legal Opinion
Toomey v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of America
District Court, D. Maine
Decided June 23, 2004No. 2:03-cv-00069PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SINGAL, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff Walter Toomey alleges that Unum Life Insurance Company of America and UnumProvident Corporation (together “Defendants” or “Unum”) unlawfully denied him long term disability benefits. Through this action, he seeks relief pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1132. Presently before the Court are: Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket # 40), Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket # 42) and Defendants’ Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiffs Objection to Defendants’ Statement of Material Facts (Docket #…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Max W. Perry v. Simplicity Engineering, a Division of Lukens General Industries, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Liston v. Unum Corp. Officer Severance PlanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Ricci v. Applebee's Northeast, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2003
- Curtin v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2004
3Cited by11 opinions
- Doe v. Solvay Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2004
- Darling v. Western Thrift & LoanDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2009
- Donovan v. FowleDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2011
- Buchanan Ex Rel. Estate of Buchanan v. MaineDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2006
- First Specialty Insurance v. Maine Coast Marine Construction Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.