Legal Opinion

Darling v. Western Thrift & Loan

District Court, D. Maine

Decided February 20, 2009No. CV-06-123-B-WPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR., Chief Judge.

Homeowners Roxanne and Joseph Darling claim their mortgage broker, Western Thrift & Loan (Western), defrauded them and violated state and federal consumer protection regimes when its agent induced them to refinance their home with an adjustable rate mortgage that is becoming more expensive by the day. Before the Court is Western’s motion for summary judgment, which the Magistrate Judge has recommended be granted in part and denied in part. Because the Court agrees with the…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Finley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Greebel v. FTP Software, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Moore v. Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2012
  2. In re EpipenDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2018
  3. OFFICEMAX INC. v. SousaDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2011
  4. Cathy Estrella v. PNF Realty, Inc., and Peter N. FlorosDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2026
  5. LOBSTER 207 LLC v. PETTEGROWDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API