Legal Opinion
Monaco v. Albert Maund, Inc.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 15, 1952PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
17 N.J. Super. 425 (1952)
86 A.2d 279
JAMES MONACO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
ALBERT MAUND, INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 29, 1951.
Decided January 15, 1952.
Before Judges JACOBS, EASTWOOD and BIGELOW.
Mr. Wallace P. Berkowitz argued the cause for the appellant.
Mr. Isidor Kalisch argued the cause for the respondent.
The opinion of the court was delivered by BIGELOW, J.A.D.
This is a workmen's compensation matter growing from an accident that happened outside of the State of New Jersey and therefore the decision of the Division of Workmen's…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mt. Olive Coal Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
- Donofrio v. Haag Brothers, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- Reynolds v. Passaic Valley Sewerage CommissionersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1943
- Vishney v. Empire Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1915
- Reynolds v. Passaic Valley Sewerage CommissionersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1944
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cunningham v. Atlantic States Cast Iron Pipe Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006
- Colbert v. Consolidated LaundryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
- Natalie Bellino v. Verizon WirelessNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Alaska Industrial BoardDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1958
- Harbatuk v. S & S Furniture Systems InsulationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.