Legal Opinion

Marcel Hair Goods Corp. v. National Savings & Trust Co.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 1, 1979No. 12460PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FERREN, Associate Judge:

This case presents two questions: (1) A party makes a motion under Super.Ct.Civ.R. 50(a) for a directed verdict at the close of all the evidence, the court reserves the motion and submits the case to the jury, and the jury returns a verdict for the other party. Immediately the court conducts a hearing and rules on the reserved motion by granting a judgment n. o. v. Is the prevailing party entitled to that judgment (assuming it is sustainable on the merits), without having filed a motion for judgment n. o. v. under Super.Ct.Civ.R. 50(b)? (2) Under a provision of a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cone v. West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Johnson v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Rita E. Shaw v. Edward Hines Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
  4. Baber v. BuckleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Barry v. HerringCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. District of Columbia v. WhiteDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Washington v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. District of Columbia v. MitchellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Washington Investment Partners of Delaware, LLC v. Securities HouseDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Baltimore v. B.F. Goodrich Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API