Marcel Hair Goods Corp. v. National Savings & Trust Co.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
FERREN, Associate Judge:
This case presents two questions: (1) A party makes a motion under Super.Ct.Civ.R. 50(a) for a directed verdict at the close of all the evidence, the court reserves the motion and submits the case to the jury, and the jury returns a verdict for the other party. Immediately the court conducts a hearing and rules on the reserved motion by granting a judgment n. o. v. Is the prevailing party entitled to that judgment (assuming it is sustainable on the merits), without having filed a motion for judgment n. o. v. under Super.Ct.Civ.R. 50(b)? (2) Under a provision of a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Cone v. West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Johnson v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Rita E. Shaw v. Edward Hines Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
- Baber v. BuckleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
- Barry v. HerringCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- District of Columbia v. WhiteDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Washington v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- District of Columbia v. MitchellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Washington Investment Partners of Delaware, LLC v. Securities HouseDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Baltimore v. B.F. Goodrich Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.