Legal Opinion

Pacificorp v. SimplexGrinnell, LP

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 15, 2013No. 090303793; A148167PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNakamoto, J.

Defendant SimplexGrinnell, LP, appeals a supplemental judgment and money award denying its motion for attorney fees, litigation expenses, and other reasonable costs. Plaintiff PacifiCorp brought this action alleging that defendant, while performing electrical work for plaintiff’s power plant, breached its contract to perform fire inspection services, which caused property damage and loss of business. The parties’ contract contained an indemnity clause in which defendant agreed to indemnify and defend against any type of damage, “including attorneys’ fees and/or litigation expenses, brought or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Yogman v. ParrottOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Williams v. RJ Reynolds Tobacco Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Emmert v. No Problem Harry, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. Squier Associates, Inc. v. Secor Investments, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  5. Boise Joint Venture v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hynix Semiconductor Manufacturing America v. Eugene Water & Electric BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. PacifiCorp v. SimplexGrinnell, LPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. Alacrity Solutions Group, LLC v. Triage RestorationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API