Legal Opinion

United States v. Goodyear

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 18, 1938No. 8725Published

1Opinion of the Court

99 F.2d 523 (1938)

UNITED STATES

v.

GOODYEAR.

No. 8725.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

October 18, 1938.

James W. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Sewall Key, Norman D. Keller, James P. Garland, and Lester Gibson, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., and Ben Harrison, U. S. Atty., and E. H. Mitchell and Alva C. Baird, Asst. U. S. Attys., all of Los Angeles, Cal., for the United States.

Dana Latham and George Bouchard, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before GARRECHT, HANEY, and STEPHENS, Circuit Judges.

HANEY, Circuit Judge.

Refund of estate taxes paid the United States was obtained by the judgment…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Burnet v. HarmelSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Poe v. SeabornSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. Reinecke v. Northern Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Chase National Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API