Legal Opinion

Town Council of New Harmony v. Parker

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 2000No. 87S01-9911-CV-673PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

Shirley Parker owns land that Robert Dale Owen and Richard Owen added to the Town of New Harmony during the nineteenth century. It was undeveloped ground on the edge of town then, and it still is. Parker wishes to sell or develop her land, and she sued the Town seeking installation of various utilities at the Town’s expense. The trial court held that the absence of these utilities constituted a taking of Parker’s land. It was not.

Facts and Procedural History

In 1871, some subdivided land called Richard Owens’ Addition to New Harmony (“the Addition”) was platted and…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Kaiser Aetna v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Armour v. City of IndianapolisSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. State Ex Rel. Cittadine v. Indiana Department of TransportationIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Johnson v. Celebration Fireworks, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2005
  4. M-Plan, Inc. v. Indiana Comprehensive Health Insurance Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Turner v. City of EvansvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 2001

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API