Legal Opinion

Picow v. Winters

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 8, 1941No. 29791PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The defendant in error, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, a minor, instituted this action by his father and next friend against the plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as defendant, to recover damages in the aggregate sum of $2,690 for personal injuries and loss of time and medical expenses incident thereto alleged to have been incurred as the result of the negligence of the servants of the defendant in unloading a piece of pipe. Answer consisted of an unverified general denial.

The cause was tried to a jury. The defendant demurred to the evidence of the plaintiff, but when his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wilhite v. BrinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. Burnett Hauert Lumber Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. Estes v. DouglassSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Roger Mills County Co-Operative Ass'n v. NeiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pallady v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API