Bunzel v. City of Golden
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore
We will refer to plaintiff in error by name and to defendant in error as Golden or the city.
Bunzel, by complaint for declaratory judgment, sought to invalidate a city ordinance on the ground that it, as amended, violated Article 2, Section 3 of the Constitution of Colorado and the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
In substance, it was stipulated that Bunzel owned property in Golden and conducted a bowling alley thereon; that he owned and operated on said premises four coin-operated “pinball” machines; that Golden adopted an ordinance regulating the use of said…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rinn v. BedfordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
- Approximately Fifty-Nine Gambling Devices v. People Ex Rel. BurkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1942
- Jackson v. DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1942
- Walker v. BegoleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1936
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bayly Manufacturing Co. v. Department of EmploymentSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
- Stulp v. SchumanColorado Court of Appeals · 2012