Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Denver

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 9, 1942No. 15,080PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PLAINTIFFS in error were defendants below and are hereinafter so referred to, or by name. Defendant in error is referred to as the city.

Defendants were convicted of vagrancy. They appealed to the county court where they were again convicted and fined $150 each. To review that judgment they prosecute this writ and ask that it be made a supersedeas. There are eleven specifications of points which in fact constitute but two assignments: (1) The evidence is insufficient. (2) Section 2, chapter 107, volume 4, '35 C.S.A., upon which the city relies, is unconstitutional.

So much of the city ordinance…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Missouri v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Pace v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. State v. GibsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  4. People v. MaxSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
  5. Post Printing & Publishing Co. v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Naim v. NaimSupreme Court of Virginia · 1955
  2. Beckett v. School Board of the City of NorfolkDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1969
  3. Game and Fish Commission v. FeastSupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
  4. In re Marriage of LaFleur & PyferSupreme Court of Colorado · 2021
  5. In re the Marriage of Dean LAFLEUR v. Timothy PYFERSupreme Court of Colorado · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API