Legal Opinion
Principe v. Assay Partners
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 7, 1992PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Diane A. Lebedeff, J.
Fourth-party defendant Meadow Mechanical Corporation asserts plaintiff’s counsel engaged in abusive, offensive and improper professional conduct during the discovery phase of litigation and moves for sanctions under part 130 of the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (22 NYCRR).
The sanctions request is based on two incidents. The first centers around insulting remarks made during depositions, which are admitted, and the second alleges an improper suggestion regarding notarizations, which is denied. This recitation is deceptively simple.…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Business Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Pavelic & LeFlore v. Marvel Entertainment Group, Div. of Cadence Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Minister, Elders & Deacons of the Reformed Protestant Dutch Church v. 198 Broadway, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re McAlevySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
- Hendrickson v. Saratoga Harness Racing, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. WunschCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Magwood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996
- In Re HillisSupreme Court of Delaware · 2004
- United States v. William W.District Court, C.D. California · 1993
- United States v. William Wunsch Beverly Wunsch Teri Lee Sowers, and Frank L. SwanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.