Legal Opinion

Thompson-Hayward Chemical Co. v. Childress

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 19, 1964No. 1 Div. 104PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Justice.

Defendants appeal from judgment for plaintiffs in action for breach of duty to warn plaintiffs of the dangerous character of a substance allegedly manufactured by one defendant and sold to plaintiffs by the other defendant. We discuss this allegation below in detail.

Stated generally, plaintiffs allege that one defendant manufactured and placed on the market a dangerous substance, i. e., a vine killer; that the other defendant sold the substance to plaintiffs; that defendants knew of the dangerous quality of the substance but failed to warn plaintiffs; that plaintiffs used the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Boyd v. Warren Paint & Color Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  4. City of Mobile v. McClureSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  5. Life Casualty Ins. Co. v. PeacockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Sar Manufacturing Co. v. Dumas Bros. Mfg.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  2. Wyeth, Inc. v. Danny Weeks and Vicki WeeksSupreme Court of Alabama · 2014
  3. Marcus v. JR Watkins CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  4. KING HOMES, INCORPORATED v. RobertsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1970
  5. Western Railway of Alabama v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API