Burnett v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Dallas District Court. — Hon. W. H. Fahey, Judge. The opinion sufficiently states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
Main Street in the town of Woodward, extending south, crosses the line of defendant’s railway not far from the station grounds. Early in the morning of February 13, 1913, plaintiff and one Arnes, each driving a team and farm wagon, approached the crossing from the north, Arnes being in the immediate lead. It was still very dark, making it difficult for plaintiff to outline the wagon in front. Both drivers were familiar with the crossing and its surroundings and had for several days been engaged in hauling ice *706over that road. Plaintiff’s evidence is to the effect that, when about 20 rods from…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Detroit & Milwaukee Railroad v. Van SteinburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
- Bruggeman v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Gray v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Kansas City-Leavenworth Railroad v. GallagherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- Platter v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Frideres v. LowdenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
- Lindloff v. DueckerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
- Richards v. BegenstosSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
- Kuehn v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
- Sohl v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1918
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.