Legal Opinion

State Water Conservation Board v. Enking

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1936No. 6325PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAilshie, J.

This is an original mandamus proceeding prosecuted by the State Water Conservation Board and one of its employees to compel the State Treasurer to pay a warrant drawn upon the fund appropriated by chap. 60 of the 1935 First Extraordinary Session Laws, which created the Board and prescribed the duties and purposes for which it was created.

The State Treasurer has answered the petition by alleging that the act is unconstitutional. It is contended by the Attorney General, who represents the Treasurer, that the act violates the following enumerated provisions of the state constitution : Art. 1,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Feil v. City of Coeur D'AleneIdaho Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Miller v. City of BuhlIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  3. State Ex Rel. Normile v. CooneyMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Balderston v. BradyIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Epperson v. HowellIdaho Supreme Court · 1916

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Jones v. State Board of MedicineIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Rich v. WilliamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Idaho Water Resource Board v. KramerIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Engelking v. Investment BoardIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Wright v. CallahanIdaho Supreme Court · 1940

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API