Legal Opinion

Bradley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 20, 1989No. B038592PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WOODS (Fred), J.

Plaintiff appeals from an order dismissing his petition to compel arbitration. We reverse.

Factual and Procedural Background

Respondent issued an automobile insurance policy to appellant. The policy contained a provision for coverage of uninsured motorist accidents and further provided that if the parties could not agree as to a settlement of the uninsured motorist action, the issue would be resolved by arbitration. On December 31, 1986, appellant was involved in an automobile accident with an uninsured motorist. Appellant and respondent could not agree as to a settlement…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. DiGenova v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. California Employment Stabilization Commission v. PayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Donaldson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Morris v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Security Life Insurance Co. of America v. MeylingDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1997
  2. People v. MunozCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API