People v. Munoz
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSBY J.
When we transferred this matter from the appellate department of the superior court, the issue concerned the impact of Proposition 8’s “Truth-in-Evidence” provision (Cal. Const., art. I, § 28, subd. (d)) on the statutory exclusionary rule for evidence obtained in speed traps. (Veh. Code, §§ 40803-40805.) The Legislature overwhelmingly 2 answered that question in the meantime with the passage of Vehicle Code section 40808. 3 (Stats. 1992, ch. 538, § 2.) It provides, “Subdivision (d) of Section 28 of Article I of the California Constitution shall not be construed as abrogating…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Andrus v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Sav-On Drugs, Inc. v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- People v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Bradley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. GouletAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1992