Legal Opinion · Dissent

Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Foster

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 5, 1990Published

1DissentSilvestri, Senior Judge

This case arose out of the non-renewal by Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (Nationwide) of the automobile insurance policies of James and Carol Berry (Berry) and John Hronakes (Hronakes). The reason given for non-renewal was that a car covered under each of the policies was involved in two accidents within 36 months. The Berrys had on separate occasions struck a guardrail and a pole while the Hronakes’ daughter had on separate occasions slid into a median strip and rear-ended another car. It was undisputed at the hearing that Nationwide did not have to make any payments on the first…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lacey v. Washburn & Williams Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Masland v. BachmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance v. Board of Finance & Revenue of CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Springfield Township v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  5. Hinkle v. HJ Heinz CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API